“It would be a mistake to reverse or suspend any of the reforms now underway at Langley without the benefit of a rigorous and objective assessment of how the new priorities, structures, and work processes are actually impacting the Agency’s core missions: collecting intelligence from human sources (HUMINT), evaluating information from all sources, and shaping conditions abroad through covert actions,” writes Steve Slick.
ISP Director Steve Slick recently published the article “Measuring Change at the CIA” for ForeignPolicy.com. In this article, Slick discusses the CIA’s reorganization recently initiated under the leadership of CIA Director John Brennan. Director Brennan’s vision for the CIA has been to modernize the agency and reduce the bureaucratic barriers that exist between the CIA’s principal professions. One example of restructuring and modernization is the creation of a fifth CIA directorate – the Directorate of Digital Innovation, which addresses the impact of digital technology in intelligence.
Slick addresses the challenges a new administration will face in deciding whether to allow the CIA to continue with their current reforms or to take the agency in a different direction. To assist with this decision, he has proposed four questions that must be asked to help leaders decide whether to abandon, reverse, modify, or support the reforms occurring at the CIA:
According to Steve Slick, the ambitious restructuring of the CIA being implemented under Director Brennan will not be completed by the time the next administration decides the direction the CIA should take. Slick recommends the new leadership of the CIA, and members of its congressional oversight committee,s resist suggestions to abandon or reverse current CIA reforms. Instead, he believes this is an opportunity for them to conduct a disciplined, objective, and outcome-based assessment on how these reforms impact the core missions of the CIA. His four proposed questions are designed to assist in informing that assessment.
Strauss Center Distinguished Scholar Joshua Busby, Intelligence Studies Project Senior Fellow Stephen Slick, and Intelligence Studies Project Program Manager Kim Nyugen recently published their poll findings in Lawfare on public attitudes towards the U.S. Intelligence Community. Polling was sponsored by the University of Texas at Austin and was conducted between 2023 and 2024. Key takeaways from the polling illustrate that a...
ISP’s Tearline student research team recently published an open-source report analyzing the impact of the May 2025 drone attack by the Sudanese Rapid Support Forces on infrastructure in the vicinity of Russia’s planned naval base in Sudan. The team assessed that Russia is unlikely to realize their plans for a naval base near Port Sudan in the next 6 to 12 months due to the...
The Clements Center for National Security and the Strauss Center for International Security and Law at The University of Texas at Austin are pleased to announce the appointment of Dr. Alexandra Sukalo to lead the University’s Intelligence Studies Project (ISP). ISP was established in 2013 as a joint venture of the Clements and Strauss Centers out of a conviction that...